Do you smell that…
… that’s the smell of fear!
Is this just the start of greater problems outside the US. The problems in the US sub-prime market started some 6 months or so ago, and it was only a matter of time before it got over here.
I do have to laugh at some of the reporting going on, it’s all very “Don’t Panic, Don’t Panic”.
But experts say it does not mean Northern Rock, which has £113bn in assets, is in danger of going bust.
My would bet that this time next year, Northern Rock will not be trading.
Meanwhile, whilst most political pundits in the UK seem to focusing on Mrs Thatcher visiting No.10… there was quite an interesting release from the Conservative Party (a party I would normally inherently distrust).
You can download the PDF of the document from here.
What was very surprising, and pleasing in a way, was that the document contain a large number of references to Peak Oil!
For example…
Reducing our demand for fossil fuels can only improve our energy security as we move towards being an energy importer in the age of ‘peak oil’.
The global response to climate change will require developed economies like Britain to decarbonise progressively over the next fifty years. The costs, even if higher in the event than those now suggested, will continue to look affordable when set against the risk and cost of inaction. They will look even more affordable as the next decade brings growing recognition of the implications of ‘peak oil’.
Any economy will struggle to compete if it does not have reliable access to affordable energy. We
have to ask ourselves whether it is in the interests of this country to remain dependent on fossil fuels,
which look set to become increasingly expensive in the age of ‘peak oil’. With reserves increasingly
concentrated in countries which carry relatively high levels of political risk, we must consider whether
our energy security interests would not be better served by higher levels of self sufficiency. We note
the brave decision of Sweden to aim for zero dependence on oil by 2020.
Yes, the Tories have actually published an official blueprint document acknowledging it. This is a huge development in my opinion and it’s a shame the national press here focused on Thatcher’s visit.
Mind you, it’s not all rosy. As the BBC themselves have pointed out, in an online article, there is a conflict of interest here.
As the BBC says…
On the one hand, the group led by former environment minister John Gummer has listed a huge number of changes on everything from limiting power consumption by domestic electrical goods to a moratorium on planned airport expansions and “grandiose programmes” of road building.
On the other hand, the group led by John Redwood proposed the creation of more privately-funded road schemes and a continuation of airport expansion.
At the same time, Mr Cameron has been insisting the Tories are the greenest of all the parties and will tax polluters, while also claiming he would run a lower tax economy than Labour.
Ahhh, it would appear that Mr Cameron has a problem on his hands. You can’t have a bit of both really can you?
Also, whilst the second ‘Green’ report was interesting, we should remember…
None of the policy review reports are binding on Mr Cameron and, now they have all reported, it is up to him to pick and chose which policies he wants to take forward to the election manifesto.
UPDATE:
Looking like a run on the bank?
People forming queues and reports of the phonelines jammed.